《亚洲时报》报道说，北约现役作战部队已经进入乌克兰

远航一号

https://asiatimes.com/2024/04/na ... ussia-races-to-win/

NATO is starting to deploy combat troops to Ukraine. Soldiers from Poland, France, the UK, Finland and other NATO members are arriving in larger numbers.

Although Russia says there are over 3,100 mercenaries in Ukraine, these newly arriving troops are not mercenaries. They are in uniform, home country proclaimed via insignia. They mostly are concentrated in the western part of the country, although in some cases they are close to the actual fighting in the east.


More or less this is the same pattern that the US used when it sent “advisors” to Vietnam.  In fact, they were US Special Forces who engaged in combat.

The Biden administration, at least for public consumption, says it opposes sending NATO soldiers to Ukraine. But Biden in truth may be waiting for his reelection before he gives the order for US soldiers to fight in Ukraine. After Biden is reelected, he will have a free hand. The recent passage of the $60 billion air bill for Ukraine signals that Congress will go along with whatever the Biden administration wants to do “fighting the Russians.”


来自波兰、法国、英国、芬兰的军队已经进入乌克兰。这些军队不是雇佣兵，而是北约现役军人，着有正式军人标志，也不是顾问，而是作战部队。

他们大多数集中在乌克兰西部，也有一些已经出现在前线。

目前，北约各国官方仍然否认已经派出作战部队，而是采取类似于六十年代前期美帝在南越进行所谓“特种战争”的模式。

如美帝国主义统治集团中最反动的拜登集团于今年11月份连任，拜登当局有可能正式派兵进入乌克兰。

根据以往经验，《亚洲时报》的报道往往还是有根据的。

远航一号

sysiphus

这是不是意味着俄罗斯军队有可能和北约军队发生正面冲突？

远航一号

sysiphus 发表于 2024-4-26 12:04
这是不是意味着俄罗斯军队有可能和北约军队发生正面冲突？

如上，北约目前还是采取越南战争期间“特种战争”的政策

“特种战争”是美国肯尼迪政府时期对越南战争扩大化但美国又不正式参战的一种政策

俄罗斯是否与北约正面冲突，取决于北约疯狂到什么程度

目前，北约还是处于野心与实力不相配的状态，但失控的危险是存在的

远航一号

Ukraine has withdrawn US-provided Abrams tanks from the combat zone because Russian drones have made them too vulnerable, AP reports, citing Pentagon sources.

https://twitter.com/MissJacque_line/status/1783716287090446651

因为损失太大，乌军从前线撤回了美制艾布拉姆斯式坦克。美帝正与基辅当局研究，怎样改进战术。